<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>com.motion &#187; CNET News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://veritascanada.com/testblog/tag/cnet-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://veritascanada.com/testblog</link>
	<description>social media strategy and execution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Facebook&#8217;s Newest Status Update? Users file privacy lawsuit against us :(</title>
		<link>http://veritascanada.com/testblog/2009/08/whats-facebooks-newest-status-update-users-file-privacy-lawsuit-against-us/</link>
		<comments>http://veritascanada.com/testblog/2009/08/whats-facebooks-newest-status-update-users-file-privacy-lawsuit-against-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Eastep</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veritascanada.com/testblog/2009/08/whats-facebooks-newest-status-update-users-file-privacy-lawsuit-against-us/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ According to CNET News, a group of Facebook users filed a civil lawsuit Monday that alleges the social-networking site is violating California consumer privacy laws.


The lawsuit, which was filed in California&#8217;s Orange County Superior Court on behalf of five users, seeks a jury trial, as well as damages and attorneys&#8217; fees. The five plaintiffs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techdigest.tv/assets_c/2009/02/facebook-small-logo-thumb-360x360-75537-thumb-300x300-78195.png"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 300px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 300px" alt="" src="http://www.techdigest.tv/assets_c/2009/02/facebook-small-logo-thumb-360x360-75537-thumb-300x300-78195.png" border="0" /></a> According to <a href="http://news.cnet.com/">CNET News</a>, a group of <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</a> users filed a civil lawsuit Monday that alleges the social-networking site is violating California consumer privacy laws.
<div>
<div>
<div>The lawsuit, which was filed in California&#8217;s Orange County Superior Court on behalf of five users, seeks a jury trial, as well as damages and attorneys&#8217; fees. The five plaintiffs are described as two children younger than 13, a user of the original Facebook, a professional photographer, and an actress and model. </div>
<p>
<div>The 40-page complaint accuses the Palo Alto, Calif.-based company of violating California privacy and online privacy laws by disseminating private information to 3rd parties for commercial purposes.</div>
<div>Facebook is no stranger to privacy controversy. In July, an <a title="Canadian official takes issue with Facebook privacy -- Friday, Jul 17, 2009" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10289686-36.html">investigation by Canada&#8217;s privacy commissioner</a> suggested Facebook is unconcerned with members&#8217; privacy and called on it to do more. Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart expressed concern that while it&#8217;s easy for members to deactivate their accounts, it&#8217;s less clear on how to actually delete them. Facebook could therefore retain member data from deactivated accounts for an indefinite period of time in violation of Canadian privacy law. </div>
<div>The social network went through a user backlash over the introduction of its <a title="Facebook's Zuckerberg: 'We really messed this one up' -- Friday, Sep 8, 2006" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-6113700-7.html">News Feed in 2006</a>, and a bigger one over the <a title="Rough seas nearly sink Facebook's Beacon -- Friday, Nov 30, 2007" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-9826664-36.html">controversial Beacon advertising program</a>. More recently, <a title="Facebook's about-face: Change we can believe in? -- Wednesday, Feb 18, 2009" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10166663-36.html">a revision to Facebook&#8217;s terms of use</a> prompted consumer advocacy blog The Consumerist to highlight language that it said meant that Facebook claimed ownership of user profile data and photos.</div>
<p><script type="text/javascript"></p>
<p>try {</p>
<p>var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-10236425-1");</p>
<p>pageTracker._trackPageview();</p>
<p>} catch(err) {}</script></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://veritascanada.com/testblog/2009/08/whats-facebooks-newest-status-update-users-file-privacy-lawsuit-against-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

